My Take on Temperament
by I/O

Perspective makes us all different, and affects us to the core of our being, to the root processing within our brain. All Socionics types employ the same processing functions but not in the same way nor to the same degree; temperament is a result of fundamental operating perspectives, and type is built on a ...
Your Comments: 1+
C1 Very well written. I see a lot of truths in this article. Please continue to share your knowledge with us. -- Anonymous
C2 I/O:can you please illustrate with a good example the "the feed back mechanism" for introverted input functions?! -- Anonymous
C3 Wikipedia states: “Feedback describes the situation when output from (or information about the result of) an event or phenomenon in the past will influence the same event or phenomenon in the present or future. When an event is part of a chain of cause-and-effect that forms a circuit or loop, then the event is said to 'feed back' into itself.” Feedback is used in an interactive (or closed-loop) system which needs a inherent basis or reference for comparison (a 'comparator' in engineering terms) whereas the autonomous, interrupt (or open-loop) system doesn't (note that the bracketed terms are defined on the web). Therefore, introverted input compares what is being said or done with what has been said or done in order to immediately affect or refine what will be said or done. For example, an ISTp will likely learn better by doing, by making it personal or by getting involved; whereas, an ESTp doesn't necessarily need to get involved or repeat a process in order to acquire the knowledge that it 'thinks' is important. ESTp will likely accept the new information that's out there fairly readily; whereas the ISTp may like to try it out first - to get some personal feedback on it. ISTp is usually fairly wary of people, things or situations that it hasn't dealt with in the past whereas the ESTp will look upon that as exciting and inspirational. The same contrast would hold true for INTp and ENTp. -- I/O
C4 I/O:can you elaborate the mechanism of (open loop systems) with a good example?! -- serag.
C5 The Farlex online dictionary defines 'open loop' as referring to: "a control system that does not have a feedback loop and thus is not self-correcting". It implies that action is expected to faithfully follow direction; however, it is a mode of operation where action usually doesn't follow directives to-the-letter. The dominant function 'generally' directs the secondary, which interprets orders somewhat 'liberally'. The lack of feedback loop means that introverted output and extroverted input generally have little effect on each other's operation even though one may determine the sphere of focus of the other. When introverted output dominates, it 'selects' a subset of the data from extroverted input 'as is' and analyzes it in order to formulate or refine a direction. When extroverted input dominates, it gives data to introverted output expecting it to 'analyze all of this quickly' in order to get back to the search pattern - but frequently EXXp ignores its own decisions and IXXj ignores key data. Regardless of which function dominates and what information is in memory, every situation can be somewhat like (re)learning to fly a plane when the instrumentation is not fully engaged. An IXXj will likely operate better in isolation, by stepping back or by remaining objective; whereas, an EXXp would only seek isolation when a decision has to be made. EXXp will want to continually seek new information, readily replacing old information; whereas the IXXj prefers a stable set of information although data can be much different than was available during the previous similar experience - however, rationalization requires that input stop. IXXj can be single-minded, intransigent and deliberate whereas EXXp will be spur-of-the-moment, non-directed and variable - decision making for EXXp is far too confining, but doable in small doses. Both these open-loop configurations demand freedom and independence - autonomy. As an INTj, I visualize structure in everything but I often disregard what I said or did in the past, and when I need refreshed data, my senses often fail me - even though I know what I need, I seem to pick up a lot of irrelevant information which can take me on tangents so I frequently need several passes and refinements to settle on the information that is important to the issue because I deliberately ignore what my intuition is telling me - extreme focus and independence are my strengths and weaknesses. -- I/O
Page 1
Would you like to add anything?
(When posting, we ask you to make the effort to qualify your opinions.)



Name: (leave blank for "Anonymous")