SOCIONICS.COM

Type distribution statistics (Dec 1999 - 17 Dec 2000)

Data type: keywords returned from various search engines
Period covered: Dec 1999 - 17 Dec 2000
Data source: log.keys.html processed on 17 Dec 2000
Population covered:

1. People who have access to the Internet
2. People who are interested in Socionics
3. People who can speak English
Keywords taken into consideration: entp, isfp, esfj....etc, which have been used alone or as a first word of the search string
Total related enquiries: 7659
Results as follow:


Distribution by "Type"

Type Enquiries Percentage Graph
ENTp 417 5.44% |||||||||||
ISFp 413 5.39% |||||||||||
ESFj 350 4.57% |||||||||
INTj 677 8.84% |||||||||||||||||
ENFj 470 6.14% ||||||||||||
ISTj 579 7.56% |||||||||||||||
ESTp 213 2.78% |||||
INFp 974 12.72% |||||||||||||||||||||||||
ESFp 250 3.26% |||||||
INTp 626 8.17% ||||||||||||||||
ENTj 360 4.70% |||||||||
ISFj 428 5.59% |||||||||||
ESTj 295 3.85% |||||||
INFj 903 11.79% |||||||||||||||||||||||
ENFp 530 6.92% ||||||||||||||
ISTp 174 2.27% |||||



Most and least common types

  Most common Least common
1. INFp ISTp
2. INFj ESTp
3. INTj ESFp



Distribution by "Individual Preference"

Preference Enquiries Percentage Graph
E 2885 37.67% |||||||||||||||||||
I 4774 62.33% |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
S 2702 35.28% |||||||||||||||||
N 4957 64.72% ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
T 3341 43.62% ||||||||||||||||||||||
F 4318 56.38% ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
j 4062 53.04% ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
p 3597 46.96% |||||||||||||||||||||||



Most and least common individual preferences

Most common Least common
I, N, F and j E, S, T and p

Important note about this result: Looking at the sum of individual preferences in the table just above, it appears that the most common type is INFj and that the least common is ESTp. However, it's been already established in the Distribution by "Type" results that it is actually INFp which is most common, and ISTp is the least common type. This little example shows that trying to identify the whole type by identifying the individual preferences does not in any way mean that you would find the whole type. Every psychometric tool working on individual preferences principal will have poor reliability because of this fact.



Distribution by "Club"

Club Enquiries Percentage Graph
NT 2080 27.16% |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ST 1261 16.46% ||||||||||||||||
NF 2877 37.56% |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SF 1441 18.81% |||||||||||||||||||



Distribution by "Quadrable"

Quadrable Enquiries Percentage Graph
Alpha 1857 24.25% ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Beta 2236 29.19% |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gamma 1664 21.73% |||||||||||||||||||||
Delta 1902 24.83% |||||||||||||||||||||||||



Distribution by "1st Function"

1st Function Enquiries Percentage Graph
947 12.36% |||||||||||||||||||||||||
1600 20.89% ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
820 10.71% |||||||||||||||||||||
1331 17.38% |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
463 6.05% ||||||||||||
587 7.66% |||||||||||||||
655 8.55% |||||||||||||||||
1256 16.4% |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||



Most and least common 1st function

  Most common Least common
1.
2.
3.



Distribution by "2nd Function"

2nd Function Enquiries Percentage Graph
1580 20.63% ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
830 10.84% ||||||||||||||||||||||
1387 18.11% ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
780 10.18% ||||||||||||||||||||
1007 13.15% ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
645 8.42% |||||||||||||||||
800 10.45% |||||||||||||||||||||
630 8.23% ||||||||||||||||



Most and least common 2nd function

  Most common Least common
1.
2.
3.

© S&I 2000 http://www.socionics.com